Feature
Gems & Gemology, Summer 2010, Volume 46, No. 2

X-ray Computed Microtomography: Distinguishing Natural Pearls from Beaded and Non-Beaded Cultured Pearls

Peer Reviewed Article
×
How to cite this page
X-ray Computed Microtomography: Distinguishing Natural Pearls from Beaded and Non-Beaded Cultured Pearls

The distinction of natural from cultured pearls traditionally has been based on X-radiography. X-ray computed microtomography (μ-CT) has recently been applied to gain more insight into pearl structures. Using this technique, this article presents features observed in a selection of natural pearls and beaded and non-beaded cultured pearls. Based on these observations, μ-CT is shown to be a powerful tool for pearl identification.

DATA DEPOSITORY

Supplementary Videos (see below)
Summer, 2010

Figures 1a and 1b Two Natural Pearls

Play Figures DD-1a, 1b
Two natural pearls, samples mxt 3 (freshwater; a) and mxt9 (saltwater; b); for details and explanation, see table 1 and figure 3.

Figure 2 A Beaded Cultured Pearl

Play Figure DD-2
A beaded cultured pearl, sample mxt 14b (saltwater); for details and explanation, see table 1 and figure 4.

Figures 3a, 3b and 3c Two Non-beaded Cultured Pearls

Play Figures DD-3a-3c
Two non-beaded cultured pearls, samples mxt 1 (freshwater; a) and mxt 61_14 (saltwater; b). Also included is a short movie showing the rendered model of the cavity structure (“moustache”) in the center of sample mxt 1 (c); for details and explanation, see table 1 and figures 5 and 6.

Figure 4 A Non-beaded Cultured Pearl

Play Figure DD-4
A non-beaded cultured pearl with a complex structure, sample mxt 21_1 (saltwater); for details and explanation, see table 1 and figure 8.

You Might Also Like

Find a Retailer
learn more
Shop the Campus Store
Learn More
Quality Assurance Benchmarks
Learn More
Gems & Gemology
G&G Fall 2017 Edition
Learn more