International Group Sets Sights on Sustainable Gemstone Mining

Miners, working in a row along a body of water, use hand sieves to sift gravel.
Artisanal miners at the Birim River near Akwatia, Ghana sift the gravels for diamonds. Photo by Russell Shor/GIA

The coloured gemstone industry plays a tiny role on the world economic stage, but it has long been an important livelihood for hundreds of thousands of miners and traders in developing countries.

Improving those miners’ returns on their labour and their working conditions has been a difficult challenge, given the fragmented nature of the industry and the myriad conflicting interests at each trading level.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) held an important first-of-its-kind forum involving gemstone mining at its Paris headquarters in May to bring together as many actors in this scattered industry as possible. The goal of the three-day conference, which included a session on gemstone mining, was to begin the process of creating policies for sustainable mining practices and increasing returns for miners who often dig by hand with little to show for their efforts.

The OECD consists of 34 developed democracies with market economies that work with each other and some 70 non-member countries to promote economic growth and sustainable development. The organisation estimates that 100 million people in more than 70 countries are engaged in artisanal and small-scale mining of a variety of minerals. About 15 million are mining for gold, including 4.5 million women and 600,000 children.

The forum, which included representatives of gold and other mineral interests in addition to coloured stones, provided a platform for source country governments, gemstone traders, miners, civil society groups, large retailers and responsible source-certifying organisations to begin hammering out policies that will benefit producing nations and miners, while balancing the interests of other players.

Interviews with participants at the meeting illustrated the challenges of balancing everyone’s interests. For example:

  • Governments want revenue from and control of their resources, while miners resist regulations and export duties.
  • Artisanal miners – those digging with hand tools – often get very little from their finds, partly because many of them operate illegally on private property or government-owned land and partly because they are often the poorest, most marginalised people in society and lack education and power.
  • Large mining companies and fair trade certification agencies can adopt policies to promote sustainable mining and labour practices, and can afford the certification process. Small miners and dealers complain that such certification measures are too costly and are often used as an excuse to muscle them out.
  • Civil society groups and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working with resources such as gemstones often insist on near airtight accountability for every gemstone mined, while miners and dealers claim that this is an unrealistic, if not impossible, goal.
  • Retailers increasingly want supply chain accountability to counter customer concerns – real or potential – over sustainability and conflict issues. Miners and dealers in source countries, however, are often unaware of such consumer concerns or have different or conflicting priorities.

The OECD is working to balance all of these conflicting interests in its guidelines. According to Estelle Levin-Nally, a consultant on mineral artisanal mining sustainability and previously director of the GIFF project, the majority of attention paid to the artisanal mining sector focuses on bringing miners into the formal sector, which means legalising their activities to help reduce their dependence on money launderers and corrupt officials, who often extort money or other benefits from them in exchange for allowing them to continue mining illegally.

Levin-Nally said governments are starting to come around on this issue. She added, however, that the “coloured gemstone industry has, by and large, accepted the relevance of OECD guidance for responsible sourcing of minerals in their sector.” She said that this is a new development, adding that there are still large gaps to work through.

“Upstream (at the local dealer and mining level) there’s concern that the downstream people are pushing sustainability priorities like environmental protection or conflict financing, while also pushing for low prices,” she said. “On the other hand, in the producing countries, the miners, exporters and government officials are desperately seeking support for their primary concern – maximising revenues. This is the foundation for stimulating investment in handling the social and environmental issues.”

She acknowledged that the realities at the mine sources, “can be quite messy with crime, smuggling and control by corrupt elements. These are problems that still need to be dealt with in many situations.” She emphasised the importance of commercial pragmatism and taking a “human-rights-based approach” to unleashing the economic potential of the sector.

Workers line both sides of a conveyer belt to sort the emerald rough that passes by them.
Sustainability audits have created a divide between larger mining firms, such as Gemfield’s Kagem emerald mine in Zambia, and artisanal miners who claim that they are disadvantaged because they cannot afford the lengthy certification process. Photo by Russell Shor/GIA

Governmental representatives at the meeting stressed the need to gain control over the mining of their resources before sustainable mining and fair labour practices could begin to operate. This means controlling mining and access to gem deposits; developing workable export procedures that bring in revenue, but do not invite smuggling; and excluding smugglers and criminal elements from mining areas.

While Levin-Nally notes that governments have been taking more initiative in this direction, Jean Claude Michelou, a gemstone trader who has worked on these issues with the International Colored Stone Association, said the situation of many “informal” miners – those mining without permission from the government – remains very difficult.

“Many of these miners have no other means of support, so we need to find a way to legalise them,” he explained, adding that a number of countries continue to regard them as illegal squatters and operators.

Michelou said some governments are now working to bring these miners into their legal framework.

“Colombia is one of the more involved governments in both its emerald and gold mining industries,” he noted. This is because the government came to understand how much revenue it was losing by keeping these miners outside the system.

Myanmar, long an outlier because of sanctions against its military government, is also moving to wrest control of its ruby and jade production out of the hands of illegal miners, Michelou said, adding that the estimates of lost revenue shocked the country’s representatives at the meeting. Myanmar’s jade production is beset by huge challenges, as noted in an earlier report.

While the OECD has developed an operational framework to account for all parties’ interests, the World Bank is starting to fund specific efforts to put these policies into practice through its Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources project.

Jeff Bilgore, who attended the meeting on behalf of the American Gem Trade Association, said his organisation has developed a code of ethics and due diligence procedures over the past three years and its aim is to get these standards adopted by the OECD.

“Our prime concerns are to balance the miners’ interests with the concerns of small family businesses in producer nations and consumers in the U.S,” he said. “There’s been a lot of progress, but it’s a step-by-step process. Things are still far from perfect, but we are moving forward.”

Russell Shor is senior industry analyst at GIA in Carlsbad.